Edited By
Fiona Kelly

A recent discussion highlights the ongoing debate over the necessity of money in a world marked by distrust. Observers note that this lack of faith fuels greed and competition, compelling people to hoard resources and engage in transactional relationships instead of trusting one another.
Participants in this conversation express varied opinions on the relationship between trust and money. Many argue that the very existence of currency stems from our inability to fully trust each other. As one comment highlights, "Money is needed when fear rules the planet." This sentiment resonates in a society increasingly reliant on transactions rather than mutual trust.
Fear and Distrust
Many commenters view fear as a primary motivator for the reliance on money. As stated, "Money is needed for people trapped in the maze of separation consciousness." This suggests a belief that without fear, the need for currency diminishes.
Concept of Ownership vs. Trading
Some participants differentiate between ownership and the concept of money, arguing that trade inherently exists in various forms, stating, "Money was made to simplify trading."
Historical Perspectives
Several individuals pointed out that humanity thrived in cooperative societies long before money existed. One user remarked, "Humans lived without any concept of money caring for friends, family for free." This perspective challenges the notion that money is essential for societal function.
"If I keep selling these things, I can be sure that later I will get an apartment."
The role of trust in transactions is significant, with others suggesting that "money works because you 'trust' that other people will always want money."
Most remarks reflect a mixture of skepticism and a yearning for a simpler, more authentic connection. Thereโs a clear frustration with a system that many see as exploitative.
โณ Many believe trust could eliminate the need for money.
โฝ Concerns about greed and fear drive monetary necessity.
โป "Money is something everyone wants" - A common consensus on transactional behavior.
Thereโs a strong chance that as society confronts deep-seated trust issues, alternative systems of value exchange could gain traction. Innovations such as barter platforms and decentralized currencies might emerge more prominently, appealing to those disillusioned by conventional monetary systems. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that these models will not only complement but also challenge traditional currency frameworks in the coming years. As people seek more immediate, trustworthy methods of trade, the reliance on money might decline, fundamentally altering economic structures as we know them.
Looking back at early communal living during the agricultural revolution offers a striking parallel to todayโs discourse. Much like modern critiques of money driving separation, early societies engaged heavily in barter and shared resources, often prioritizing community well-being over individual profit. This shift toward cooperation led to the establishment of lasting bonds amongst members, helping them collectively weather challenges. In todayโs context, similar shifts away from monetary dependence might encourage trust-based initiatives, reminiscent of those ancient societies where relationships mattered more than transactions.