Edited By
Elena Duran

A significant move is reportedly underway as President Donald Trump directs Jared Kushner to work on a post-war strategy for Gaza. This comes amid ongoing discussions about possible ceasefire actions and future stability plans, raising both hopes and concerns among political figures.
According to Channel 12, Kushner has been tasked to shape what is being termed the "day after" plan for Gaza. This strategic shift was discussed in a meeting held in Miami, involving Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff. Reliable sources confirm that Kushner is becoming a key player in this initiative, as the U.S. contemplates its involvement in the region's future.
"Israel will have influence, but it wonโt be the Bibi plan or the Dermer plan," a U.S. official told Channel 12, hinting at a departure from previously established strategies.
While many watch this development closely, comments among political commentators reveal a sharp divide. Notably, some critic who had a previous exposure to Kushner during Trumpโs first term describes him as โevery bit as evil as Trump,โ suggesting a pattern of skepticism regarding his involvement. Given Kushner's past role in facilitating the Abraham Accords, opinions vary on his current impact.
Kushner's increased presence raises questions about the overall approach of the U.S. administration to the ongoing conflict. Observations from political circles indicate:
Skepticism about Kushner's intentions: Comments highlight doubts regarding his strategic motives, with some suggesting a nefarious agenda.
Notable influence over Israel: Signals imply that Israel may have a role, but a new direction is anticipated, diverging from established leaders' plans.
Long-term geopolitical ramifications: Analysts remain concerned about how these strategies could affect relations in the broader Middle East.
โก Kushner often viewed with suspicion due to his past role.
๐ง A U.S. official indicates a shift away from traditional plans.
๐ฌ "He was effectively the shadow President in the first term" - An outspoken critic.
As the situation develops, the administration's next steps will be closely monitored by analysts and political followers alike. The fallout from these plans could reshape not just Gaza but the entire political landscape in the region.
There's a strong chance that the U.S. will pursue a new diplomatic engagement model for Gaza, emphasizing regional partnerships. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that Kushner will propose joint initiatives aimed at improving economic conditions post-conflict, highlighting international collaboration. This approach could involve various stakeholders in the Middle East, along with significant financial backing from the U.S. However, thereโs also potential for backlash, especially from those who suspect ulterior motives behind Kushner's involvement. Continued tensions may arise, leading to a split among political circles as differing factions within Israel and the U.S. voice their opinions about this unexpected strategy.
A less obvious parallel can be drawn between Kushner's role and the Berlin Airlift in 1948-49. Just as the U.S. government had to navigate a complex post-war landscape in Europe, relying on innovative solutions to provide support and rebuild trust, the current administration faces the challenge of restoring stability in Gaza. Both situations share the theme of using strategic partnerships to overcome geopolitical divides. The airlift, while controversial and fraught with risks, ultimately laid the groundwork for a future alliance. In this light, Kushnerโs initiatives may serve similar purposes: reshaping relationships in a volatile environment, despite skepticism from critics.