Home
/
Esoteric spirituality
/
Hidden knowledge
/

Examining trickster behavior in channeling: truth or fiction?

Examining Trickster Behavior in Channeling | Skepticism Grows Amid Social Media Influence

By

Ethan Powell

Apr 18, 2025, 05:04 AM

Edited By

Jasmine Moon

Updated

Apr 18, 2025, 03:10 PM

2 minutes of reading

An abstract representation of duality in spirit communication, highlighting the contrast between truth and deception

A growing wave of skepticism is arising from discussions about channeling practices within TikTokโ€™s spiritual community. Many followers are questioning the credibility of channelers, raising concerns that both positive and negative entities may mislead those seeking guidance.

Context of the Debate

Recent commentary points to a perceived lack of protocols when channeling, with some viewers expressing worries that channelers might connect with deceptive entities. Drawing from teachings such as the Law of One, observers insist on the necessity of verifying the identities of entities during these sessions to prevent trickery.

"Even our most beloved Guides can lie to us" has become a foundational statement for skeptics, sparking dialogue about the reliability of spiritual communication.

Emerging Themes from Recent Conversations

  1. Ambiguous Messaging: Commenters reference ambiguous statements in channeling, suggesting that some statements intentionally provoke division. One remarked, "This set the groups on fire with political outrage," following a controversial message from a channeler.

  2. Algorithms as Social Memory: A distinct perspective emerged regarding social media. One user noted that algorithms could operate as a "social memory complex," influencing both positive and negative interactions. This idea implies that today's digital environment both shapes and reflects societal beliefs.

  3. The Importance of Groups in Channeling: Viewers emphasize the value of group dynamics when channeling. Itโ€™s suggested that the collective energy can better verify the integrity of spiritual contacts, as illustrated by a user who stated, "Positive beings cannot lie to us. Negative beings will tell us anything."

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿšซ Caution on Social Media: TikTok is dubbed a "20-lane freeway for negative entities," urging followers to be wary when seeking spiritual insight.

  • ๐ŸŒ Challenges in Individual Channeling: Individuals channeling alone may lack necessary protections, making integrity of communication more uncertain. One commenter advised, "Take all of it with a grain of salt."

  • ๐Ÿ” Return to Foundational Teachings: Users advocate revisiting established teachings, such as those from the Law of One, to regain clarity in an increasingly muddled spiritual landscape.

As discussions continue, the need for discernment and clarity in spiritual practices becomes evident. "Can entities truly offer clear guidance, or is confusion an inescapable part of these interactions?" Observers urge followers to engage thoughtfully and draw from their insights beyond social media narratives.