Gravity vs. Frequency | The Theory That Sparks Controversy
A new theory linking gravity and frequency is causing hot debates across various forums. The claim suggests gravity functions through frequency stagnation, not merely as a pulling force. Critics from the scientific community are voicing strong skepticism amid rising discussions.
The Central Claim
The theory proposes that matter and gravity are linked through vibration patterns. It contends that celestial bodies develop in areas of minimal vibrations. Yet, it faces a significant backlash. One commenter stated, "What did you smoke?" underscoring skepticism about its validity.
Many assert that the transformation of light into matter contradicts established physics, particularly thermodynamics.
Key Assertions Under Attack
Here are core components of the theory that raised eyebrows:
Light is said to shift into different states of matter based on vibrational levels.
There’s a claim that larger planets correspond with lower vibrational energy.
Gravity is purported to originate at a "dead spot" of frequency rather than traditional attraction.
Comments emphasize critical flaws:
"Photons don’t condense into protons," echoes one participant, pinpointing a fundamental misunderstanding.
Another highlighted, "The bigger the planet, the bigger the vibration," challenging the foundational logic.
Diverse Reactions from the Community
Responses range from humor to harsh critiques. Some dismiss the theory as science fiction, while others present counterarguments for deeper analysis. One user remarked, "This is just science fiction you're writing here," reflecting a belief that the theory lacks scientific bases.
Interestingly, another user questioned the concept, "Are there 'geometric shapes' and 'non-geometric shapes'? If so, what is the latter?" This indicates further probe into the theoretical underpinnings.
Furthermore, a user pointed out a technical error about frequency and vibration, stating, "Frequency and vibration are not synonyms; frequency describes how quickly something vibrates."
Key Observations
📉 Numerous comments highlight flaws in the theory's grasp of gravity against established science.
🎤 "Mass = energy multiplied but where's the logic in that?" noted a participant, expressing frustration.
🤔 "This isn’t original crankery; it's plagiarized," indicated another commenter, questioning the originality of the ideas proposed.
The Path Forward
Despite the flurry of skepticism, discussions about this theory may intrigue some researchers. Speculation is that a faction might investigate connections between frequency and gravity, though mainstream scientists remain doubtful.
Reflection on Scientific Change
History shows radical ideas can sometimes reshape core scientific understanding. Just as Einstein faced skepticism, today's debates around frequency and gravity could eventually shift paradigms.
With the conversation ongoing, observers are left pondering: Will this theory gain traction or dissolve into obscurity?
Insights from the Community
△ Several remarks reject the theory’s claims about gravity.
▽ Community sentiment leans negative, with heavy criticism on fundamental principles.
✨ "Everything starts as light. Then transformed depending on which speed that frequency is slowed down to," reflects the underlying theory.
Stay tuned for more updates on this evolving narrative.