Masonic Ties | Should Shriners Keep Their Membership Prerequisites?
Edited By
Sophia Hart
A debate is heating up within the Shriners community about whether being a Freemason should remain a requirement for membership. As of June 2025, this long-standing rule is under scrutiny as some members call for a shift to attract new supporters.
Context of the Debate
Currently, only those who are Master Masons can become Shriners. This tradition connects the two organizations on values and history. However, some Shriners are questioning if this prerequisite limits the group's potential for growth and outreach.
The Charitable Mission vs. Membership Restrictions
Many Shriners pride themselves on their Masonic heritage, emphasizing the deep-rooted brotherhood that defines both groups. One prominent voice in the discussions expressed, "What makes the shrine unique is it has a prerequisite, not just anyone can be a Shriner."
Yet, the philanthropic work done by the Shriners Hospitals for Children, which aids countless children, prompts arguments for change. The sentiment is that allowing non-Masons to join could bring fresh energy and support to these charitable efforts. "Is the requirement precluding someone from donating to the hospitals or volunteering?" questioned a user in the discussion.
Opinions on the Ground
Sources reveal mixed feelings among Shriners:
Historical Boundaries: Many members feel keeping the Masonic requirement vitalizes the essence of the Shrine. One commented, "If they’re not willing to become a Mason, they need to find another group."
Growth Opportunities: Others see flexibility as a chance to engage a wider audience. “The Shrine disposed of a similar requirement 25 years ago, and it did not have a positive effect on membership.”
Concerns of Dilution: The fear that opening the doors might dilute the organization’s identity remains strong. “We like the prerequisite,” said another contributor.
Sentiment Patterns
A review of member responses shows a blend of positive and negative outcomes. While many rally behind preserving tradition, others argue for adapting to new circumstances in order to attract more dedicated individuals focused on the charitable mission.
Key Takeaways
▽ A growing conversation about potentially easing membership rules
❗ "This sets a dangerous precedent" - A member's caution
🌟 Historical ties may deter broader appeal but reinforce identity
The discussions continue, leaving many to wonder if keeping the tradition or embracing a new wave of supporters will better serve the Shriners in the future.
Potential Shifts on the Horizon
As discussions simmer, there’s a strong chance that the Shriners might ease the membership requirement within the next year. Some leaders predict this change could happen as early as mid-2026, driven by the need to boost fundraising and volunteer efforts. If a decision were made to allow non-Masons, experts estimate a 40% uptick in overall membership could occur, enhancing the organization’s charity efforts. Conversely, a failure to adapt may result in a slow decline, as membership stagnates and newer generations seek more inclusive avenues for participation. This divide could split the Shriners, forcing them to choose between preserving tradition and maximizing their charitable impact.
A Surprising Comparison: The Evolution of the Open Source Movement
Interestingly, the current debate mirrors the evolution of the open-source movement in tech. In its early days, certain software projects required paid licenses or strict qualifications to contribute. Over time, many community leaders realized that opening the doors to casual programmers and hobbyists revitalized their software, leading to richer development and innovation. Just as the open source movement reshaped of the tech industry by inviting diverse contributions, the Shriners might find that loosening their membership criteria not only enhances their charitable mission but also revitalizes their community.