Home
/
Paranormal activities
/
Supernatural events
/

Why didn't the security camera capture the noises?

Security Camera Misses Eerie Sound| Investigation Fuels Online Debate

By

Liam Carter

Dec 27, 2025, 05:03 AM

Edited By

Ethan Cross

Updated

Dec 29, 2025, 03:47 AM

2 minutes of reading

A security camera installed in a dimly lit room with a rocking chair, suggesting an eerie atmosphere where sounds are unexplained

A growing discussion surrounds why security cameras at a reported haunted site failed to capture strange noises linked to the contentious "devil's rocking chair room." Opinions vary, and skepticism has intensified, especially after recent comments surfaced.

The Ongoing Investigation

Commencing in December 2025, the inquiry has spotlighted concerns over the effectiveness of audio and video security systems. Commenters have questioned the integrity of the investigation itself. Notably, one user challenged, "And youโ€™re telling me he just so happened to โ€˜checkโ€™ the cameras on his phone while he was in a different state at 1 am? Come on, bro." Such remarks add fuel to existing suspicions.

More intriguing comments pointed to the sound's origins. One person claimed, "Omg so mechanical. I also heard that sound you make with the mic during a mic check, or something like that." This suggests a possible non-paranormal explanation for the noises, shifting the narrative around the investigation.

Key Themes Unfold

The discussion has highlighted three main themes, reflecting differing opinions:

  1. Skepticism about Sound Authenticity

    Many people express doubt about the noises, with one stating they felt embarrassed by claims of paranormal activity. "Those growls were so fake," echoed another commenter.

  2. Technical Reliability

    Comments indicate that the technology may not successfully capture all audio events, raising questions about its reliability.

  3. Trust Issues

    Disappointment in the integrity of the investigation has grown, exemplified by frustrations expressed toward key figures involved. As one commenter remarked, "Is this show all about money now and not the love of the paranormal!? They are treating us like idiots. Wtf!?"

"Many believe the technology may not adequately capture all audio," an online commentary suggested, reflecting the sentiments echoed throughout various user boards.

Insights from Recent Comments

  • ๐Ÿ’ฅ "Those growls were so fake" โ€“ a clear indicator of rising skepticism.

  • ๐Ÿ”Š "Omg so mechanical" โ€“ emphasizes doubts about the paranormal narrative.

  • ๐Ÿ’” "I feel an overwhelming sense of sadness" โ€“ signals disappointment among passionate followers of the paranormal.

As 2025 wraps up, these dialogues around the investigation remain dynamic and heated. The outcome could reshape how haunted sites must approach security measures in future investigations. Will this stir more significant changes in the evaluation of ghostly claims? Only time will tell.