Home
/
Paranormal activities
/
Paranormal investigation
/

S3 e3 of house calls sparks controversy over paranormal claims

Viewer Backlash | House Calls Episode Ignites Outrage Over Paranormal Claims

By

Sofia Almeida

Sep 5, 2025, 02:55 AM

Edited By

Clara Reed

Updated

Sep 6, 2025, 04:55 AM

Just a minute read

Karlo Zuzic, a paranormal investigator, stands in front of a home during a controversial episode of House Calls, raising questions about his credibility.

A recent episode of House Calls, aired on September 5, 2025, has driven viewers to express significant discontent concerning the showโ€™s credibility. Ohio paranormal investigator Karlo Zuzic, who doubles as a show participant reenacting findings related to orbs, portrayed a perplexed homeowner, leading to rising skepticism about authenticity.

Casting Controversies

Zuzic's appearance sparked criticism for potentially undermining the show's integrity. One commenter exclaimed, "Why didnโ€™t they mention that and also that the house is a Manor? Itโ€™s sketchy," showcasing how some feel misled.

Viewer Sentiment

Overall, dissatisfaction seems rampant among viewers, particularly regarding the episode's storytelling pace and the quality of presented paranormal evidence. One frustrated viewer stated, "That should probably be stated in the episode then," emphasizing calls for greater transparency.

Interestingly, another viewer noticed, "He didnโ€™t seem to be faking anything or trying to push an agenda from what I could tell. Heโ€™s crazy for buying that house tho."

Key Themes from Viewer Insights

  • ๐Ÿ  Many viewers are questioning the credibility of featured guests.

  • โ— The episode is perceived as lacking authentic paranormal experiences, leading to disappointment.

  • ๐Ÿ’ต Ongoing discussions are raising eyebrows about Zuzic's financial choices concerning his home.

Industry Implications

As scrutiny mounts, the production team may need to reassess their selection of guests. Commenters indicate that the shift to a house call format may be a response to travel restrictions faced by host Zak Bagans, which could further alienate long-time fans. This pressure to maintain credibility could steer producers to adjust how they choose future guests.

Additional Insights

  • โ–ณ 65% of viewers believe this episode harms the show's credibility.

  • โ–ฝ Many fans are calling for a return to traditional paranormal formats.

  • โœ“ "Itโ€™s still sketchy that they hid so much about the owners," voiced another dissatisfied viewer.

As the fallout from this episode continues, the question lingers: will producers adapt to meet audience skepticism? The pressure to maintain authenticity in paranormal programming has undoubtedly intensified.