Controversy Grows | Where's the Original Manuscript of the Book of the Law?
A heated debate continues to unfold among Thelemites and scholars regarding the original manuscript of the Book of the Law. Discussions sparked by an alleged 1905 watermark and questions surrounding its existence have taken center stage on various forums.
The Manuscript's Supposed Location
The manuscript, attributed to Aleister Crowley, is believed to have been dictated in 1904, yet its whereabouts remain uncertain. Opinions vary widely—some folks suspect it may have been damaged or hidden, as one commenter stated, "There’s absolutely zero evidence that the paper used to write the manuscript originates from 1905."
Questions About the Watermark
Contention surrounds the 1905 watermark itself. Critics have pointed out that claims regarding the watermark’s significance lack credible proof, calling into question its effect on the manuscript's delivery narrative. As one user succinctly put it, "This claim comes from charlatan Richard Cole who hasn’t provided the necessary evidence."
Diverse Perspectives on Manuscript Content
Debate also emphasizes the manuscript's content. Many Thelemites express their dedication to the teachings rather than its physical origins. A user highlighted, "As a Thelemite, I'm more concerned about the content of the Book of the Law than the who/where/why/when it was written."
An additional side note remarks on word variations within the manuscript itself, hinting at possible changes over time. A commenter noted adjustments in phrasing, like "star and star system, and system" instead of the original text, indicating inconsistencies exist.
Insight Into Location Claims
Despite ongoing disputes, various suggestions about the manuscript's possible hiding spots have surfaced among users:
Stored in a safe deposit box in NYC: A secure, clandestine option.
Under the guardianship of the U.S. Grand Lodge of the OTO: A point raised by several commenters, implying institutional custody.
In Austin, Texas, at the UT library: A location frequently cited for its restricted access credentials.
Key Insights
▽ Watermark claims remain contentious, raising doubts about their validity.
△ Community focus largely pivots on the manuscript's teachings rather than its history.
✅ "There’s zero evidence the paper originates from 1905" - Shared sentiment from multiple commenters.
As the debate continues, many in the Thelemite community may demand greater transparency around the manuscript's status. Digital archives could lead to unofficial replicas emerging within a year, in line with evolving interests in scholarly research.
Culminating Thoughts
The conversation reflects a modern interest in understanding one’s spiritual heritage while acknowledging the uncertainty of historical narratives. The ongoing inquiries surrounding the Book of the Law demonstrate a complex interplay of belief, scholarship, and the human drive to seek clarity in mystery.