Is OTO a Secret Society? | Exposing Terminology Confusion
A growing buzz on forums questions whether the OTO should be classified as a secret society. Recent comments explore this label's implications, highlighting a clear division between openness and the existence of secrets within the group.
Rethinking "Secret Society"
Many contributors to the conversation argue against the label of "secret society." As one person noted, "A society with secrets is not the same as a secret society." Discussions clarify that OTO’s secrecy revolves around specific practices and member interactions, rather than covert operations.
Secrets vs. Clandestine Operations
Defining Secrecy: The distinction is crucial. Commenters emphasize that OTO should be viewed as having secrets—such as membership details and certain rites—not as operating hidden from the public eye.
Member Discretion: A commenter stated, "It's secret in that you are forbidden from 'outing' your brethren publicly." This suggests a societal structure valuing confidentiality but doesn’t align with the idea of it being completely hidden.
Varied Public Perception
Feedback reflects a split sentiment regarding transparency in OTO’s practices. While some people prefer a level of exclusivity, others believe in a necessary push for more openness. A member mentioned,
"Fair comment, it’s cool discussing published material" indicating a desire for discourse without compromising privacy.
Mixed Sentiments and Humor
The atmosphere of the discussion still carries an undertone of skepticism, with comments that mix humor and critique of common perceptions. For instance:
>
This highlights a tongue-in-cheek acknowledgment of how information is widely available today.
Key Takeaways
🕵️♂️ OTO is a society with secrets, contested as a secret society.
🔑 Membership discussions reveal limitations, highlighting a mix of secrecy and openness.
😂 Humor pervades the sentiment, reflecting a balance between skepticism and curiosity.
As the community continues to dissect the essence of OTO, they're pushing to redefine common misconceptions, aiming for a deeper understanding of what the group stands for today.