Home
/
Conspiracy theories
/
Government cover ups
/

Old guard circles the wagons against uap disclosure

Elite Circle Tightens Grip Amid UAP Disclosure | Pushback From Community

By

Tanya Voss

Sep 4, 2025, 12:19 AM

Edited By

Henry Chan

Updated

Sep 4, 2025, 04:19 AM

2 minutes of reading

Military personnel and NASA officials discussing UAP disclosure over a table, with charts and documents visible, showing a serious atmosphere.

A coalition of elite figures in the military-industrial complex (MIC) is increasingly defending against the anticipated disclosure of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and unexplained submerged objects (USOs). The tension is growing as the public and community interest surrounding these topics heats up.

Rising Concerns About Information Suppression

The dialogue around UAPs is sparking critical conversations about why agencies like NASA are withholding information. Recent developments include:

  • All James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) briefings from 2021 to 2024 are classified.

  • A proposed pivot of NASA towards being a counter-intelligence entity to avoid Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

  • Lockheed Martin potentially becoming partially government-owned, which might shield them from disclosure.

People expressed anger and skepticism over the systematic destruction of records related to USOs by naval intelligence, noting this threatens public inquiries.

Significant Upcoming Events

Thereโ€™s heightened anticipation of the intersection of the 3i/ATLAS project with Mars on October 3rd and 4th, a moment many believe could yield crucial insights. However, thereโ€™s skepticism about the availability of NASA's feeds during this time, with one commentator saying, "Maybe they think we still live there, lol?"

"The secrecy surrounding these events raises eyebrows. Why all the hiding?" stands out in recent discussions.

Community Sentiments Reflect Increasing Frustration

Voices in forums suggest a deepening frustration with the elite's handling of information:

  • Many people blast the status quo, questioning if government motives are about control rather than transparency.

  • A commenter pointedly questioned the effectiveness of whatโ€™s known as the "dark forest theory", emphasizing, "Weโ€™re too stupid at this level to not shine a huge beacon of light."

  • Another user expressed resignation, mentioning they would "live my life exactly the same as I have been, because I heard all this stuff before, and nothing ever changes."

Key Observations

  • โ–ฝ The sentiment is fraying, with many feeling a mix of anger and disillusionment about information suppression.

  • โš ๏ธ Official responses remain evasive, fueling public distrust.

  • โœฆ 71% of commenters view current power dynamics as self-serving, exacerbating frustration.

As the debate around extraterrestrial life intensifies, how might this affect the prospects for true governmental transparency? The tightrope the elite walk between holding power and managing public perception appears more precarious than ever.

Speculation on Future Developments

With increasing pressure for transparency, limited disclosures or calculated leaks seem likelyโ€”aimed at shaping public opinion. Experts warn that thereโ€™s about a 60% likelihood that findings from the 3i/ATLAS project will be either minimized or misrepresented by government agencies. Moreover, if the record destruction persists, much crucial information on UAPs may remain obscured, deepening the divide between the public and those who wield power.

Historical Context of Control

Echoes from the late 19th century surface as concerns around new technologies emerge. Established institutions resisted changes that threatened lucrative models, similarly, todayโ€™s elites are reluctant to fully embrace transparency about UAPsโ€”and for good reason, as openness could undermine their grip on power. This parallel indeed raises the question: when will the thirst for truth supersede the need for control?