Edited By
Nina Bard
A growing number of individuals are voicing concerns over the integration of artificial intelligence in studying occult practices. Recent discussions highlight skepticism about the reliability of AI tools, particularly ChatGPT, in accurately conveying esoteric knowledge.
In recent conversations on online forums, many commenters are emphasizing the need for studying and practicing occult rituals with dedication. This sentiment arises amid a surge in interest regarding the use of AI for guidance in spiritual practices.
Several themes emerge from the ongoing dialogue:
AIโs Limitations in Depth: Users express that AI lacks true understanding. One commenter stated, "AI cannot replace study and dedication."
Caution on Research: Resources like Thomas Karlsson's writings on Qliphoth are recommended as trustworthy guides, suggesting that personal research remains crucial.
Skepticism Toward AIโs Accuracy: Many voices in the conversation argue that relying on platforms like ChatGPT can lead to unreliable insights. A commenter noted, "ChatGPT is pretty unreliable for accuracy."
"Itโs just guessing what you want it to say."
Anonymous Commenter
Amid these discussions, one user articulated frustration with AI-generated content's lack of depth, saying, "No actual depth behind them."
The rising popularity of using AI as a tool for occult practitioners invites scrutiny. While some find value in brainstorming rituals, others push back against allowing AI to shape spiritual paths.
โฆ Recommendations for thorough research remain strong among practitioners.
โฆ Skepticism about AI's reliability is prevalent, with concerns about its responses lacking depth.
โฆ Efforts to engage with foundational texts are encouraged to ground personal practices.
As the conversation continues, the friction between tradition and technology becomes increasingly palpable. Will practitioners adapt these trends to enhance their understanding, or will skepticism prevail? Only time will reveal how this debate unfolds.