Home
/
Esoteric spirituality
/
Occult practices
/

Exploring occult rituals and ai: what people think

Occult Rituals | AI's Role Sparks Heated Debate

By

Sophie Klein

May 5, 2025, 06:03 PM

Edited By

Nina Bard

Just a minute read

A mystical scene showing an artificial intelligence interface with symbols of occult rituals like candles and tarot cards around it.

A growing number of individuals are voicing concerns over the integration of artificial intelligence in studying occult practices. Recent discussions highlight skepticism about the reliability of AI tools, particularly ChatGPT, in accurately conveying esoteric knowledge.

Context: The Intersection of AI and Esoteric Studies

In recent conversations on online forums, many commenters are emphasizing the need for studying and practicing occult rituals with dedication. This sentiment arises amid a surge in interest regarding the use of AI for guidance in spiritual practices.

Mixed Feelings About AI in Spirituality

Several themes emerge from the ongoing dialogue:

  • AIโ€™s Limitations in Depth: Users express that AI lacks true understanding. One commenter stated, "AI cannot replace study and dedication."

  • Caution on Research: Resources like Thomas Karlsson's writings on Qliphoth are recommended as trustworthy guides, suggesting that personal research remains crucial.

  • Skepticism Toward AIโ€™s Accuracy: Many voices in the conversation argue that relying on platforms like ChatGPT can lead to unreliable insights. A commenter noted, "ChatGPT is pretty unreliable for accuracy."

"Itโ€™s just guessing what you want it to say."

  • Anonymous Commenter

Amid these discussions, one user articulated frustration with AI-generated content's lack of depth, saying, "No actual depth behind them."

Implications of AI in Occult Practices

The rising popularity of using AI as a tool for occult practitioners invites scrutiny. While some find value in brainstorming rituals, others push back against allowing AI to shape spiritual paths.

Key Insights

  • โœฆ Recommendations for thorough research remain strong among practitioners.

  • โœฆ Skepticism about AI's reliability is prevalent, with concerns about its responses lacking depth.

  • โœฆ Efforts to engage with foundational texts are encouraged to ground personal practices.

As the conversation continues, the friction between tradition and technology becomes increasingly palpable. Will practitioners adapt these trends to enhance their understanding, or will skepticism prevail? Only time will reveal how this debate unfolds.