Rep. Burlisonโs latest statement has reignited debates over UFO technology. He revealed heโs in contact with a source claiming the U.S. has a cutting-edge propulsion system linked to the infamous Tic Tac UFO, suggesting Lockheed Martin's involvement. This assertion has sparked significant interest and skepticism in equal measure.
The source purportedly possesses video evidence illustrating the evolution of the Tic Tac craft, featuring the first three iterations. Burlison remarked, "I did see a photoโฆ Itโs nothing that Iโve ever seen." This could potentially shift the existing dialogue surrounding unidentified aerial phenomena.
While some people are intrigued, others express doubt about the claims. Among the various comments:
"Greer has been saying that Tic Tac UAPs are Lockheed technology for years. Interesting," noted a commenter, linking back to previous assertions about the craft's origins.
Another chimed in, "If Lockheed Martin is capable of flying craft with no visible means of propulsion, Iโm all ears. Every physicist would be too." This highlights a thirst for credible advancements in aviation technology.
Critically, some responses suggest a deeper societal worry regarding suppressed breakthroughs. Commenters expressed frustration with governments allegedly prioritizing military gains over addressing global challenges like climate change: "If they have the answer to climate change all along, itโs sickening to think about."
Burlison's revelations have drawn a variety of sentiments:
Optimism: Some hope for revolutionary aviation technology.
Skepticism: Others doubt the veracity of the claims, given the lack of concrete evidence.
Frustration: Many express weariness over repeated claims lacking substantiation.
"Itโs always โIโve seen a pictureโ or โa videoโ; itโs getting tiresome," one expressed, capturing a sentiment quite prevalent in the discourse.
โก New propulsion tech discussions emerge alongside revived UFO debates.
๐ Burlison's source claims to have video of three Tic Tac craft iterations.
๐ค Comments show skepticism about the credibility of these claims, raising questions about military involvement in technological suppression.
The implications of these claims could reshape discussions about UFOs and military technology. As the conversation continues, many are left to wonder: Whatโs next in the evolution of propulsion technology?