Edited By
Henry Chan

A recent revelation has emerged regarding a program potentially affiliated with MK-Ultra that is reportedly operational as of 2025. While details remain murky due to file destruction, its ties to federal agencies raise serious concerns about ongoing human rights violations.
The facility in question has established connections with federal agencies such as DARPA and military technology contractors, hinting at a deeper involvement in national security research. Sources within the intelligence community express doubts about its independence from CIA oversight. One source stated, "Their methods and torture techniques mirror those used in known MK-Ultra programs."
"The UN has condemned them for torture, yet actions have been scarce," noted an anonymous former worker.
Despite government funding amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars over the years, the facility's practices have come under scrutiny. Arrests were made, but many employees faced little consequence for their actionsโ"slaps on the wrist," in the words of insiders.
An individual closely monitoring the situation is set to meet with a congressional representative to discuss the release of pertinent data, hoping to shed light on the humanitarian implications. "I will be surprised if this isn't connected to the CIA," they noted, indicating confidence in the similarities to recognized torture techniques.
Sentiment among bystanders appears critical, as many feel desperate for accountability. "Even if this company is not directly linked to the CIA, thereโs no denying torture programs exist that are funded by the government," expressed a concerned observer.
In online forums, perspectives vary:
Local Awareness: Comments like "Is this about Cinnamon Hills?" demonstrate growing awareness, particularly in Utah.
Personal Accounts: Others share firsthand experiences. "I went to one of these places. I can confirm," remarked a contributor, adding weight to the ongoing discussion.
Demand for Action: Users are eager for change, voicing a collective discontent regarding the lack of government intervention.
โป๏ธ Multiple connections to federal agencies raise alarm over operational transparency.
โฒ Torture allegations have prompted public outcry and calls for regulation.
โ "With other intelligence personnel confirming similar issues, itโs time for action," stresses a participant in the discussion.
As these allegations unfold, the need for vigilance remains clear. The promise of accountability through congressional action sparks hope amid distrust. Will this situation lead to reform, or will it remain shrouded in secrecy? Stay tuned for updates.
Given the current scrutiny on this program, there's a strong possibility we will see increased pressure from Congress for transparency. Expect to hear more calls for hearings, with experts estimating around a 75% chance that new legislation could be proposed to regulate such practices heavily. As public outcry continues to mount, significant media coverage may also push federal agencies to address these issues more openly. If the intelligence community faces mounting evidence of wrongdoing, we might even see internal investigations leading to substantial reforms.
A striking parallel can be drawn to the controversial practices used in the War on Drugs during the 1980s, where covert operations and often brutal tactics were justified in the name of national security. Just as communities reacted to those policies with growing concerns over civil liberties and human rights violations, so too does the modern public demand answers today. The shadows of history remind us that when accountability is delayed, it often leads to a more significant crisis of trust in institutions.