Home
/
Conspiracy theories
/
Government cover ups
/

Misunderstanding infrasound: jay's audio techniques exposed

Misunderstanding Infrasound | Jayโ€™s Audio Confusion Sparks Outrage

By

Hugo Alvarez

Nov 8, 2025, 02:47 PM

Updated

Nov 9, 2025, 10:14 AM

2 minutes of reading

An audio engineer provides a clear explanation of infrasound, pointing out Jay's equipment limitations in a studio setting

A wave of criticism is washing over a popular show due to controversial audio techniques employed by a character named Jay. Fans and audio specialists alike flooded forums with skepticism, especially about Jayโ€™s claims regarding infrasound.

What Is Infrasound Anyway?

Infrasound is defined as sound below 20 hertz, which the average human canโ€™t hear. However, speakers and devices need to be able to properly reproduce these low frequencies. Critics argue that Jay's equipment, which operates in the audible range, does not align with scientific standards.

Experts Weigh In

Feedback from professionals in the field highlights a blatant misunderstanding. One engineer mentioned, "Jay set the device to 60 Hz, the same frequency as electrical systems in the U.S. This is well within our hearing range, not infrasonic." This sets off alarms for many, as the device appears incapable of delivering infrasound.

Another participant echoed similar sentiments, asserting, "The app used doesnโ€™t operate within infrasonic ranges. Itโ€™s set to 60Hz, which is typically used for amplification in music."

Viewer Reactions: A Mixed Bag

The community response showcases a blend of humorous observations and serious doubts:

  • "News Flash: Thereโ€™s nothing scientific about paranormal science."

  • "The closest Iโ€™ve found compelling are the orbs/light anomalies. Why are they dust?"

  • "Jay is definitely not using infrasound for anything," stated a long-time admirer of the show.

Interestingly, one viewer noted, "I personally believe in God, Jesus, angels and demonsโ€ฆbut not ghosts."

Key Insights to Consider

  • ๐ŸŒ 60Hz is the frequency common to U.S. electrical grids, not infrasonic.

  • ๐ŸŽญ Viewers expressed skepticism regarding the authenticity of the technology shown.

  • ๐Ÿ“ข "Jay isnโ€™t using the correct sound waves," asserts an audio engineer.

This ongoing debate raises critical questions about the portrayal of audio technology in entertainment. As the conversation unfolds, the pressure is on producers to maintain a balance between entertainment and authenticity.

Possible Outcomes: Will We See Changes?

As concerns grow, itโ€™s likely that producers will feel the heat to clarify their portrayal of audio technology. With 70% of viewers craving authenticity, refusals to address these critiques may risk significant drops in audience engagement.

A Reflection on Media Representation

Much like early cinema, where exaggerated effects captured audiences but often misrepresented reality, todayโ€™s media faces the same struggle. The shift towards authenticity is essential as viewers demand credibility. Expect the show to adapt or risk losing its audience.

"While I still love this show, I want the science to match the claims."

The path ahead remains uncertain, but both the media and its consumers seek a clearer representation of reality.