Shocking New Claims on Amy Eskridge's Death | Directed Energy Weapons Allegations Resurface
A recent entry in the Congressional record by Michael Shellenberger has sparked intense discussions surrounding the death of antigravity researcher Amy Eskridge. Allegations have surfaced claiming that Eskridge was murdered by a private aerospace company, with connections made to the UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) community. Notably, a retired UK intelligence officer, Franc Milburn, has claimed she was targeted with directed energy weapons.
A Closer Look at the Claims
Shellenberger's submission not only highlights Eskridge's contributions to propulsion technology but raises serious questions about her alleged targeting due to her research. Milburn's assertion suggests that this high-powered interest might have led to lethal consequences. In an alarming quote from the commentary, one commenter stated, "If Amy really was murdered, it means we do have that advanced technology!" This sentiment echoes broader suspicions regarding those in control of scientific advancements.
Skepticism and Disbelief Amidst Grieving
While the allegations raise eyebrows, many users on forums express skepticism about the evidence.
Rumors Surrounding Direct Energy Weapons: Commenters are divided over Milburn’s claims. One pointedly questioned, "How would a retired UK intelligence officer know? Sounds like a complete fantasy to me." Many find the allegations difficult to swallow without concrete proof.
Public Awareness of Advanced Weapons: Several comments reflect a want for more transparency regarding directed energy weapons and their use against civilians. "The fact that stuff like this gets glossed over is the worst tragedy," lamented one participant.
Speculation on Eskridge's Mental State: There’s also a focus on Eskridge’s mental health. Reports indicate she lived in chronic pain, stopped her pain medication, and showed signs of paranoia in her last interview. "Amy’s last interview is extremely unnerving. She’s clearly drunk but also gotten deeply paranoid," observed one commenter, hinting at the toll her work and circumstances may have taken on her.
Building a Narrative of Concern
These developments have led to heightened anxiety within the community regarding the possible lengths powerful corporations and entities might go to suppress uncomfortable truths. A prominent user summed it up, saying, "If this is true, we need to immediately move all research on the topic to the public domain."
Key Insights
⚠️ Skepticism surrounds the allegations of murder; many question the credibility of claims.
🔍 Growing calls for transparency regarding potential non-lethal weapons and their misuse.
💔 Mental health discussions reveal deep concerns about the pressures faced by researchers.
As the dialogue continues, many are left wondering what this could mean for the future of research, transparency in technology, and public trust in powerful institutions. The story of Amy Eskridge is a stark reflection of broader issues entwining scientific exploration and ethical boundaries.
The Road Ahead
Expect this case to influence future legislation and public perception about research safety protocols, particularly concerning sensitive topics like UAPs and advanced propulsion technologies.