
A shocking find in Los Angeles has incited widespread outrage. On May 27, 1982, approximately 17,000 babies were discovered in a repossessed storage unit, many beyond 20 weeks gestation, left by a medical lab charged with disposing of aborted fetuses.
Sources indicate that financial mismanagement led the lab to abandon these remains. "So literally 0 babies," a commenter stated, questioning the characterization of the remains as babies rather than non-viable fetuses. Indeed, some state that only 193 of the fetuses found were over 20 weeks.
The case has reignited debates across various forums, with one user asserting, "Literally 0 babies, only non-viable fetuses 200 of which were 20 weeks but below 24 weeks per the law." This highlights the ongoing confusion about the classification of these remains.
The lab, Medical Analytic Laboratories, was contracted by numerous clinics and hospitals for pathology testing and medical disposal. The business ultimately failed, leading to the abandonment of fetal remains in storage.
An eyewitness mentioned, "Many of the children were found missing arms, legs, heads, and internal organs." While some commenters expressed disbelief, others sought to clarify the situation, stating that the remains were preserved in jars filled with formaldehyde, which may have masked any odor.
Classification Debate: The language surrounding these remains continues to stir strong opinions.
Ethical Accountability: Questions are emerging regarding the management of fetal remains and the ethics of disposal practices.
Financial Instability: Poor management practices resulted in this distressing situation.
People are demanding accountability. Comments such as, "Need more data. Are those babies or fetuses?" reflect a call for transparency in handling sensitive medical materials. Interestingly, a user commented, "How could people not smell the decaying bodies?" addressing speculation around the circumstances of the find.
โ ๏ธ Only 193 fetuses were confirmed to be over 20 weeks.
๐ Many remains found were severely harmed before being neglected.
๐ "Did Corbett or Whitney Webb cover this?" โ conversations stress the need for clarity.
As public anger swells, officials may be pressured to implement stricter regulations regarding sensitive medical materials. Experts anticipate a high likelihood of new policies emerging due to an increasing demand for accountability.
This situation opens up alarming questions regarding the oversight of facilities responsible for medical materials. The community may witness protests advocating for reforms surrounding ethical medical practices.
This incident spotlights the importance of proper management of remains. As societal standards push for improvements, this troubling story sparks essential discussions driving a re-evaluation of medical ethics in handling fetal remains.