Home
/
Paranormal activities
/
Ufo sightings
/

Joe rogan and jesse michels on ufo crashes and rubio's role

Rogan and Michels on UFOs | Tension Grows Over Tech Race with China

By

James Carter

Dec 2, 2025, 10:06 AM

Edited By

Ethan Larson

2 minutes of reading

Joe Rogan and Jesse Michels talk about UFO crashes and technology competition with China, with a focus on Marco Rubio's role
popular

Amid growing concerns about UFOs and potential technologies, Joe Rogan and Jesse Michels dive into the implications of Marco Rubio's involvement in these discussions. Their talk raises eyebrows, with some critics suspecting ulterior motives tied to big money interests.

Context of UFO Disclosure

In a recent podcast, Rogan claims Rubio is anxious about China potentially advancing in technology through UFO crash retrievals. Comments on the podcast reflect a mix of skepticism and frustration regarding the motivations behind these conversations. Some claim that this could serve as a way to justify past military actions while ignoring accountability for historical advancements hidden from the public.

Themes Addressed by Critics

Several main criticisms emerged from listeners:

  • Financial Accountability: Many feel this movement may simply be a cover for military contractors to secure more taxpayer funding.

  • Distrust in Disclosure: Some argue that discussions surrounding reverse engineering remain vague, creating a false narrative of urgency. As one comment states, "As if they donโ€™t swindle enough money from American taxpayers already into giant black budget programs?"

  • Scientific Skepticism: Notably, the podcast raised questions about the moon landing, prompting another user to exclaim, "._. Moon landing, fake. Aliens, real. Do I have that correct?"

Key Quotes Capture the Sentiment

According to comments gathering attention:

"This is all a coordinated effort to provide legal amnesty for the crimes of those in the MIC who withheld the greatest technological advancements from humankind"

Another user remarked,

โ€œThe faster we pull the bandaid off and move forward the better.โ€

Such sentiments suggest a blend of hope and skepticism among listeners.

What's Next?

As discussions about technology and UFOs intensify, accountability remains a hot button issue. Could this push for disclosure ultimately lead down a path of radical change, or will past practices dominate?

Key Takeaways

  • โšก Tech Race Concerns: Marco Rubio's focus on UFO technology raises national security fears.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Public Distrust: Criticism suggests a hidden agenda from military interests.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Diverse Reactions: Mixed sentiments reveal varying levels of optimism and skepticism among people regarding disclosure.

Future Scenarios on UFO Discussions

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that as conversations about UFOs and technology ramp up, weโ€™ll see increased scrutiny from both lawmakers and the public, particularly concerning military spending. Experts estimate around 60% of people are skeptical about how financial resources are being allocated in these discussions. If the push for disclosure and accountability gains momentum, it could lead to significant policy changes. We may also witness heightened activism focused on transparency in government dealings with defense contractors. With rising tensions in the tech race, particularly with China, the spotlight on UFO technology may amplify national security fears, making it more likely that authorities will either have to disclose information or face growing backlash from the public.

Echoes from the Cold War Era

Consider the 1960s during the Cold War, where the space race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union was framed as a matter of national pride and security. Just like today's debates on UFOs, discussions back then were steeped in secrecy and skepticism, with many questioning the motives of the government and the true nature of their technological advancements. The fervor for transparency in space exploration mirrored today's concerns about military intentions behind tech disclosures. Both eras reflect a fundamental struggle for accountability against a backdrop of intense rivalry, raising parallels about how society might respond when faced with claims of hidden truths.