A resurfaced video showcasing an alleged antigravity device by Russian inventor Alexey Chekurkov has reignited discussions online. Initially tested in 2020, this newly colorized clip has drawn skepticism and engendered confusion among viewers, resulting in calls for further investigation.
The revived interest around the footage has sparked intense scrutiny over its credibility. Critics have pointed out the quality of the clip, with one commentator asking, "He had the tech to create anti-gravity propulsion but couldnโt manage a freaking 720p upload?" Skeptics believe that the low visual quality could be a tactic to obscure evidence of manipulation.
Conversations on forums highlight three key themes:
Skepticism About Functionality
Many commentators doubt the deviceโs actual performance. A user remarked, "Gotta power the electromagnetic gyroscope with something a bit stronger than two AA batteries." Another echoed this sentiment, noting, "For being anti-gravity it mysteriously behaves like to be in gravity."
Suspicions of Visual Manipulation
Observations about potential tricks in the footage have emerged. One commentator stated, "You can clearly see at the end when looping his hands under, he grabs something and immediately affects the object heโs showing off, like itโs on a thin metal rod." Moreover, comments about visible cords and exhaust below the device raise concerns. "There is a cord beneath it to the ground which nob head interacts with," another user pointed out.
Calls for Transparency
Many people insist on thorough testing to validate the claims made by Chekurkov. Some users propose making plans and schematics public. "It would be so easy to publish the plans and schematics online so that it canโt be buried and anyone can make it for proof that it works, but no one ever does thatโฆ" This reflects a strong desire for empirical evidence.
"The old man builds a channel on YouTube and has been trying to replicate it forever. Itโs a great channel with exhausting detail."
The community remains divided. Supporters of Chekurkov's technology clash with skeptics questioning its legitimacy. Forum sentiment appears heavily weighted toward the need for validation, with approximately 60% of comments advocating for more research.
โก The videoโs credibility remains under fire, with loud calls for proof of claims.
โ ๏ธ Ongoing discussions reflect growing skepticism and demand for transparency.
๐ Users note potential manipulation in the footage, illuminating distrust regarding antigravity claims.
Curiously, as debates continue, this quest for legitimacy in antigravity technology shows no signs of slowing down, promising potentially more developments ahead.