Home
/
Conspiracy theories
/
Government cover ups
/

Official uspto docs prove fruit of the loom's cornucopia exists

Official Docs Confirm Fruit of the Loom's Cornucopia | New Insights Emerge

By

Maria Gomez

Jun 4, 2025, 10:56 AM

Updated

Jun 6, 2025, 09:56 AM

2 minutes of reading

Official USPTO document showing Fruit of the Loom's registered cornucopia trademark and details about fruit categories.
popular

Recent findings from the USPTO confirm that Fruit of the Loom previously registered a trademark including a cornucopia, contrary to the company's current claims. The filing, dated November 28, 1988, and retrieved on October 29, 2024, raises significant questions about collective memory and corporate accountability.

Trademark Details Illuminate the Issue

The relevant document, Registration #73006089, includes a cornucopia alongside various fruits:

  • Berries, Raspberries, Strawberries

  • Grapes

  • Apples

  • "Baskets of fruit, Containers of fruit, Cornucopia (horn of plenty)"

This documentation counters Fruit of the Loom's statements denying the cornucopia's existence in their branding. One observer pointedly noted, "Millions werenโ€™t misremembering; this seriously puts their claims into question."

Legal Backstory Grows Complex

Interestingly, the trademark was canceled after formal proceedings required by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), suggesting deeper legal issues at play. The cancellation mandated intervention, pointing to a heightened level of corporate scrutiny. New data shows that the trademarkโ€™s cancellation wasn't a simple expiration but involved formal legal proceedings.

Community Reactions Reflect Divide

Buzz in forums indicates mixed feelings. Some commenters have expressed skepticism, questioning the implications of the findings. They note, "What else are they hiding?" Another stated, "This sets a dangerous precedent for corporate transparency."

Curiously, insights suggest that the inclusion of the cornucopia in past trademark applications may indicate that the company was considering this design element in their branding.

Additionally, many users challenged narratives around the trademark, with one remarking, "Thereโ€™s plenty of erroneous information around; this trademark has been discussed regularly in ME circles for years." As memories of the cornucopia persist, the conversation continues.

"This isnโ€™t speculationโ€”this is their own federal trademark filing explicitly listing a cornucopia."

Emergent Questions

As this story develops, critical questions remain:

  • Why would Fruit of the Loom deny their past?

  • What does this mean for corporate accountability and collective memory?

Key Insights

๐Ÿ” Official trademark document confirms cornucopia representation.

๐Ÿ“… Registration #73006089 verifiable via USPTO records.

โš–๏ธ Legal proceedings required for the trademark cancellation raise concerns.

๐Ÿ’ฌ "What else are they hiding?" - Community member reaction.

As investigations yield further insights, corporate transparency may face heightened scrutiny. This situation invites parallels to past corporate oversights and echoes calls for authenticity in branding. Stay tuned for more updates as new documentation emerges through ongoing inquiries.