Edited By
Sophia Hart

A growing debate surrounds Builders of the Adytum (BOTA) as members question its classification as a religious organization. Some claim it lacks the non-religious stance similar to AMORC, which states clearly that it is not a religion, stirring discussions in various forums.
Many individuals are drawn to the study of the occult through organizations like BOTA, which emphasizes spiritual growth through Western mysticism. However, their declaration as a religious entity raises concerns for those who prefer a secular approach to spiritual education.
Views among BOTA and AMORC members reveal a spectrum of opinions on religious classification:
Some see BOTA as non-religious, emphasizing its compatibility with diverse faiths.
Others question whether its religious status serves mainly for tax purposes.
A few express discomfort with references to the Bible found in BOTA's materials.
"Membership does not require you to relinquish your religion or other orders," one member noted, pointing to BOTAโs inclusivity in spiritual practice.
The sentiment around BOTAโs classification remains varied:
Positive: "Teachings are broadly compatible with monist or monotheist faiths."
Neutral/Skeptical: "The official status might just be for tax benefits, not necessarily an indication of indoctrination."
Negative: "Occasional biblical references disturb the spiritual path Iโm seeking."
โฆ Many feel that BOTA's designation applies primarily for tax reasons.
โฆ Official materials indicate support for spiritual paths without strict religious constraints.
โฆ "Religious organization" appears to reflect legal classification rather than a commitment to specific beliefs.
As more people seek spiritual pathways without the weight of religious dogma, the discussions surrounding BOTAโs status could influence future membership and organizational visibility in the esoteric community.