Edited By
David Harper

In November 2025, many Americans raise eyebrows as the U.S. gradually discontinues the penny. Some people see this as a strategic move by banks and the government towards eliminating cash transactions entirely.
The conversation around getting rid of the penny centers on its cost-effectiveness. The current minting process of a penny reportedly costs more than the coinโs face value. One commenter stated, "The penny almost costs a nickel to make - there is the conspiracy." Similar views emerge from multiple sources, forcing many to question whether itโs all just an effort to transition to a cashless society.
Another theme permeating the discussion is the concern over digital banking control. Critics argue that removing cash makes it easier for authorities to track financial transactions and control access to funds. "Without cash, you don't own your money," said one observer on a popular user board. This sentiment reflects a mix of skepticism and fear regarding the implications of a cashless economy.
Interestingly, a prevalent concern noted is how businesses may benefit from the removal of the penny. "Totals will be rounded to .05," stated one commenter, fearing that this would negatively impact consumers by increasing costs. Others echoed this worry, suggesting that the move could further enhance corporate profit margins while leaving ordinary people to bear the brunt of inflation.
"We lose. There was always a simpler solution.โ
๐ซ Rising Costs: Critics emphasize that making pennies costs more than their value, pushing for their discontinuation.
๐ Increased Surveillance: As cash fades, some believe it fuels state control over finances.
๐ฐ Corporate Profits: Rounding transactions could line corporate pockets at consumer expense.
As more communities see cashless transactions becoming the norm, the question remains: will this lead to greater convenience or deeper government oversight?
For further information, check reliable resources like the U.S. Mint or local economic news outlets.
Thereโs a strong chance we will see a gradual shift in the U.S. toward fully cashless transactions by the end of the decade. Banks and technology companies are likely to promote digital wallets and other cash alternatives, pushing cash use into further decline. Experts estimate that by 2030, around 60% of all transactions could occur without cash, as younger generations prefer the convenience of digital options. This transition, however, might not come without pushback. People who value financial privacy and those affected by the digital divide, especially low-income groups, may advocate fiercely to retain some form of cash. The potential for increased corporate profit margins through transaction rounding could fuel these debates, raising questions about equity and access in a cashless society.
In the late 1990s, the rise of the internet sparked widespread concern about privacy and controlโa shift not unlike todayโs move toward a cashless economy. Just as many feared the erosion of personal privacy in digital communications, todayโs discussions about cashless transactions echo those worries over surveillance. The push for digital interaction transformed how we communicate, often prioritizing convenience over privacy. Ironically, those old fears laid the groundwork for stronger privacy regulations in the digital age. As the push for cashless transactions intensifies, a similar response may emerge, prompting people to demand safeguards and standards that protect their financial privacy in a world increasingly shaped by technology.