Edited By
Natalie Quinn

A recent claim by Dr. Steven Greer regarding a sphere dating back 12,560 years has ignited discussions among enthusiasts and skeptics alike. He reports correspondence from two independent linguists confirming that the inscriptions on the sphere resemble proto-Sanskrit.
The conversation around ancient artifacts continues to thrive, particularly with Dr. Greer's findings challenging established narratives about history. Some argue that such claims shed light on a possible ancient civilization's advanced knowledge, while others remain skeptical.
The comments reflect several themes:
Many commenters link the artifact to the Younger Dryas period, suggesting it may relate to a historical defense measure against cosmic threats. An anonymous comment stated, > "All roads lead back to the Younger-Dryas Maybe a rival species wanted a 'regime change.'"
Several voices raised concerns about Dr. Greer's credibility and the authenticity of the artifact. One participant bluntly questioned, "How do I get 12500 years old resin and fake this?"
Interestingly, some believe this sphere represents "unimaginable and ancient technology" that contests mainstream history. Commenters expressed intrigue and speculation about advanced civilizations lost to time.
The sentiment in the discussion is mixed. Comments ranged from supportive of Greer's views to outright dismissive and critical of his methodology and expertise.
"Itโs all speculation; just a hypothesis before it becomes a theory."
"Pretty sure heโs reptilian lol"
"Carbon dating has a fidelity of around 50,000 years; anything smaller is guesswork."
๐ Controversies at Play: Comments reflect major skepticism toward Dr. Greer's claims.
๐ก๏ธ Younger Dryas Theories: Interest peaks in historical events linked to the artifact.
โ Questioning Authenticity: Many doubt the sphereโs legitimacy, asking for solid evidence.
As the debate unfolds, the conversation surrounding such artifacts raises questions about humanity's understanding of its past and the complexities of ancient civilizations.
As the claims regarding the Buga Sphere continue to circulate, thereโs a strong chance that both supporters and skeptics will intensify their discussions. Experts estimate that in the next few months, further investigations may emerge, including scientific analyses of the sphere to verify its age and origins. A substantial proportion of enthusiasts will likely rally around any findings suggesting authenticity while skeptics will push back hard against the narrative, increasing scrutiny of Dr. Greer's methods. As debates unfold, forums will become a battleground for new theories and interpretations, making it probable that interest in ancient civilizations will grow.
Looking back, the debate surrounding Greerโs claims reminds us of the initial discoveries of the Dead Sea Scrolls in the mid-20th century. At the time, these scrolls sparked similar controversies, with some praising them as groundbreaking and others questioning their origins. Just as the scrolls fueled discussions on biblical text interpretations and ancient traditions, the Buga Sphere debate may challenge the very fabric of whatโs accepted about human history, perhaps sowing seeds for future revelations that redefine our understanding of civilization's narrative.