Home
/
Esoteric spirituality
/
Hidden knowledge
/

Why grand masters say dogs lack buddha nature

Does a Dog Have Buddha-Nature? | Insights Spark Fresh Debate

By

Lila Stone

May 5, 2025, 06:07 PM

Updated

May 12, 2025, 04:36 AM

2 minutes of reading

A dog sitting with a bone in its mouth, looking content but distracted.
popular

A fresh wave of discussion is flowing through forums regarding whether dogs possess Buddha-nature, reigniting a controversial view originally posited by Grand Masters. The conversation, largely driven by Dharma Master San Canโ€™s teachings, indicates varied perspectives among participants, particularly about ignorance and material attachments.

Revisiting the Context

Dharma Master San Can's assertion that dogs lack Buddha-nature because they focus on mundane items, like bones, parallels human behaviorโ€”many people obsess over smartphones and fame, losing sight of their inherent nature. This ongoing dialogue emphasizes the relevance of such teachings today, as participants dissect their implications and personal beliefs.

Key Themes Emerging from the Commentary

  1. Understanding of Buddha-Nature: Many people stress that if one doesnโ€™t actively explore their Buddha-nature, it might as well be nonexistent. This perspective echoes a broader understanding of awareness across all beings.

  2. The Duality in Perception: Some participants contend that suggesting any separation from Buddha-nature reveals a misunderstanding rooted in dualistic thinking. This idea challenges listeners to reflect on their perceptions of superiority and inferiority.

  3. Koans and their Role: The discussion additionally brings forth the concept of the hua tou or koan regarding "Mu," suggesting that the inquiry into whether dogs possess Buddha-nature transcends simple answers, urging deeper contemplations on the nature of enlightenment.

"If you donโ€™t cultivate, itโ€™s as if you donโ€™t have Buddha-nature."

  • Anonymous Commenter

Voices from the Forum: Counterpoints and Reflections

  • Notably, a user asserted that every being, sentient or not, holds Buddha-nature, yet highlights its emptinessโ€”"Buddha nature is fundamentally void, since there is no Buddha nature whatsoever."

  • Another pointed out the spiritual significance of cultivating awareness of this nature, encapsulated by the analogy of a poor man who fails to recognize the wealth sewn into his clothingโ€”a valuable lesson on the potential within.

Sentiment on forums appears mixed. While some emphasize a collective understanding of Buddha-nature, others stand firm in their beliefs regarding non-sentient beings being devoid of it.

Key Takeaways

  • โ–ณ All beings potentially share Buddha-nature, dismissing the notion of a hierarchical existence.

  • โ–ฝ Insights highlight our societal obsessions, mirroring traditional teachings about ignorance.

  • โ€ป "Clinging to possessions leads to ignorance of true nature" โ€“ commonly echoed sentiment.

What implications arise from acknowledging or dismissing oneโ€™s inherent nature? The lively dialogue continues to unfold.