Time Machine Concept Ignites Controversy | Critics Question Mechanics and Feasibility
A budding author's time machine idea is stirring up heated discussions in forums, with both fans and critics engaging heavily. While opining on the physics involved, many experts and commenters challenge its practicality. Will these elements enhance or detract from its story?
How the Device Works
The story follows Owen Owings, a physics professor at the fictional Polytechnic Institute of Perth. His method requires a hefty energy injection of 780 Joules per kilogram. However, debates focus on whether these mechanics can hold water.
Rapid Time Jumps and Tuning Challenges
Recent comments reveal more about the mechanism:
Time Jump Dynamics: One commenter explained that with an initial 400 Hz frequency, the device takes them back around 450 years in just twelve seconds within the continuum. When retuned to 25 Hz, it allows a slower passage of time, equating ~100 milliseconds inside the jump to a full day outside.
Sitting in the Bush: In addition to flying time, there's concern about the days spent trying to avoid Indigenous people while the professor determines their landing time using astronomical sightings.
Fuel Considerations: Another critical question raised is about the fuel situation. Does the entire adventure last only eight hours?
"It seems too fast. Those jumps feel rushed." - Forum commenter
Surprisingly, while some viewers appreciate the complex approach, skepticism remains about the realism of a fictional time machine within the narrative's structure.
Key Points from the Discussion
🔹 Velocity issues: Critics emphasize potentially infinite G forces on time jumps, posing severe questions about feasibility.
▽ Energy tuning: There are suggestions that fine-tuning the counterfield is vital to mitigate disastrous consequences upon exit.
💬 Narrative function: A commenter highlighted how mechanics impact character actions, driving the protagonist's use of aircraft for the time travel endeavor.
Despite differing opinions, the discussions reflect a strong desire to see credible science underpinning fiction. This scrutiny brings critical thought to the imaginative exploration within storytelling.