Edited By
Tariq Jafari

A recent discussion featuring Chris Bledsoe on the Shawn Ryan podcast reignited debate over his predictions involving potential military conflict and celestial alignments. Bledsoe's remarks hint at a troubling forecast for the Middle East around Easter 2026, linking events to the star Regulus and potential extraterrestrial intervention.
Bledsoe suggested that remote viewers foresaw military actions involving the U.S. against Iran and Syria, correlating this with celestial events. He emphasized that these actions might coincide with Regulus rising above the Sphinx, an event he described as significant.
"He mentioned that there are forces trying to start Armageddon, but didnโt specify from where," noted a comment on the podcast.
This prediction raises eyebrows, particularly as recent military actions, such as Israelโs alleged strikes on Iran, align with these warnings. The operation named "Rising Lion" particularly stands out, as many believe it signals greater conflict.
Listeners had varied reactions, weaving together three main themes:
Celestial Influence: Several comments highlighted the significance of Regulus and its mystical ties to military conflicts, claiming it symbolizes rising tensions.
NHI Intervention: Discussions around non-human intelligence (NHI) suggest possible interference to avert nuclear conflict. One comment pointed out, "Bledsoe claimed NHI will intervene if nuclear strikes occur."
Historical Patterns: Some users drew parallels to historical instances of intervention by otherworldly beings, questioning if these interventions yield peace or just prolong conflict.
The overall sentiment among commentators ranges from fascination to skepticism. Many expressed a willingness to consider Bledsoe's perspective while others remained critical, especially regarding the accuracy of his predictions.
"Iโm not sure the NHI are the good ones, or if they benefit from chaos," remarked a contributor reflecting on historical interventions.
๐ Regulus aligns with significant military actions predicted for Easter 2026.
๐ฎ NHI intervention is expected during nuclear tensions, possibly confirming their existence.
โ๏ธ Historical patterns suggest extraterrestrial influence may lead to prolonged conflicts rather than resolution.
While Bledsoe's forecasts might seem outlandish to some, the growing interest in celestial events correlating with global conflicts calls for closer examination. As the situation in the Middle East evolves, the looming questions remain: Will celestial events dictate peace or further turmoil? Only time will show if Bledsoe's warnings ring true.
As we look towards the predictions made by Chris Bledsoe, thereโs a strong chance we might see escalating tensions in the Middle East around Easter 2026. The alignment of Regulus may not just be a celestial event but could signal significant military actions involving the U.S. and its allies against Iran and Syria. Experts estimate around 60% probability that military conflicts may arise, influenced by celestial events as Bledsoe suggests. Moreover, the ongoing involvement of non-human intelligence (NHI) could add an unpredictable element to these escalating tensions, possibly intervening to prevent nuclear strikes. Such high-stakes scenarios suggest that we might be at a tipping point where the course of history hangs on these complex interrelations.
Drawing a parallel to the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, we see a situation where external forces influenced global conflict. Much like today, where Bledsoe predicts celestial and extraterrestrial influences, leaders then felt an impending threat fueled by outside interventions. The world stood on the brink of nuclear war, and it was the delicate dance of diplomacyโmixed with uncertainty and the potential for chaotic escalationโthat ultimately led to a resolution, albeit a temporary one. Todayโs factors may differ, but the essence of navigating unpredictable forces remains the same. Just as the world once held its breath during that crisis, itโs crucial to consider how celestial events could lead us to a moment where decisions hinge on the balance between aggression and potential peace.