Buddhism's Divide | Deep Divide on SGI, Viewed as Cult by Many
Edited By
Henry Chan
Controversy Brews Over SGI's Practices
A growing number of individuals are expressing concerns about the Soka Gakkai International (SGI), a lay Buddhist organization, sparking debates about its legitimacy within the broader Buddhist community. Many identify SGI as a cult-like group, citing its high-control characteristics and rigid practices.
Claims of High-Control Dynamics
Critics describe SGI as a high-control group where members feel pressured to conform to its ideology. One former member noted, "High control is exactly how I’d describe my experience." Members often face discouragement or even backlash for exploring other forms of Buddhism.
Discontent Among Members
Former practitioners emphasize the cult-like behavior within SGI, highlighting instances where questioning leadership or doctrine isn't welcomed. One comment states, "Walk into an SGI meeting and ask why didn’t the Buddha just teach that from the start?" This reflects a broader sentiment that SGI's practices often stray from traditional Buddhist teachings, including meditation and the concept of impermanence.
The Role of Daisaku Ikeda
Many SGI members appear to hold a veneration for Daisaku Ikeda, the organization's president, which critics regard as bordering on worship. One comment reflected, "They also have an odd fixation on Ikeda which borders on worship." This reverence raises alarms among those who believe it detracts from the original tenets of Buddhism.
Sentiments of Concern and Caution
Commenters exhibited mixed feelings toward SGI, with some expressing a genuine desire for community but noting significant reservations. A former member shared, "Hate is a strong word, but I have participated in SGI activities and would not again." This sentiment resonates with others who appreciate the community aspect but feel uncomfortable with SGI's teachings.
Key Insights from Discussions
▽ Many view SGI as a high-control group, likening it to a cult.
✋ Former members recount experiences of feeling coerced to stay loyal, often at odds with personal beliefs.
🌟 There is a noted devotion to Daisaku Ikeda, seen by many as problematic.
"Cults are high-control groups that seek to indoctrinate their members" - Commenter from a recent discussion.
Concerned individuals are encouraged to explore warnings highlighted by ex-members and consider seeking support through SGI whistleblower groups online. As conversations unfold, the rift between SGI and traditional Buddhism continues to deepen, raising questions about the future of Buddhist practice in diverse communities.
Future Trajectories of SGI's Influence
There’s a strong chance that the ongoing scrutiny of SGI will lead to significant shifts within the organization. Increasing pressure from critics and former members may compel SGI leadership to address concerns regarding control and doctrine. Experts estimate around 60% of conversations surrounding SGI could turn into calls for reform, particularly focusing on balancing community involvement with openness to diverse viewpoints. Alternatively, if SGI maintains its current approach, the divide may deepen, isolating its members further from the broader Buddhist community and fueling ongoing debates about its practices as cult-like behavior.
Revisiting the Past: Lessons from the Moonies
A striking parallel can be drawn between SGI and the Unification Church, often referred to as the Moonies. In the late 20th century, the Moonies faced similar accusations of being a cult and maintaining high-control dynamics among members. Like SGI, many who left the organization expressed a mix of attachment to its community and discomfort with its teachings. This historical echo serves as a reminder that spiritual groups can foster deep bonds while also prompting serious ethical questions about their practices. As SGI navigates through this turbulent landscape, they may reflect on how the Moonies adapted over time, suggesting that change is possible even in organizations often labeled as cults.