Edited By
David Hargrove

Tom Brady is at the center of a storm after announcing that his new dog, Junie, was cloned from his late pet Lua, who passed away in 2023. This revelation coincides with news from Colossal Biosciences, the biotech company that helped facilitate the cloning, raising eyebrows about ethical implications and the future of cloning.
Brady shared the news on November 4, provoking mixed reactions among people online. Some expressed fascination with the advancement of cloning technology, while others voiced concern over its morality. One commenter noted, "They cloned sheep 20+ years ago, my bet is theyโre cloning humans by now."
While cloning pets may seem harmless to some, experts caution against jumping to human cloning. An immunologist commented, "We have a problem with human cloning called Epigenetic Reprogramming Errors," highlighting significant roadblocks in creating viable human clones. The implications suggest that if human cloning were possible, it might be used primarily for organ harvesting, deepening ethical concerns.
This incident raises questions about the influence rich individuals, like Brady, have on cloning technologies and ethical standards. As one commentator noted, "rich people are super weird rather than helping a pup that needs a home, they recreate their dead dog." Critics are wary of how celebrity culture might normalize cloning pets when many animals still wait for adoption.
"I find it sick it's anti-human and anti-nature," stated another commenter, reflecting a growing distress over the trend.
๐ Brady's dog cloning announcement raises ethical concerns.
โ ๏ธ Experts warn against premature advancements in human cloning.
๐ฌ "This sets dangerous precedent" - a widely shared viewpoint.
Amid this controversy, it begs the question: Are we venturing too far into realms humanity isnโt ready for? As cloning technology continues to evolve, public discourse will likely intensify.
As cloning technology progresses, thereโs a strong chance that debates surrounding its ethical implications will intensify. Experts estimate that within the next decade, advancements could make pet cloning more accessible, possibly leading to a rise in demand among affluent individuals. However, the ethical backlash might prompt stricter regulations on cloning practices, prioritizing the welfare of existing animals in shelters. The landscape of pet ownership could fundamentally shift, with more people questioning the morality of cloning versus adopting. This tension between excitement for technology and societal concerns may shape public policy and industry standards around cloning.
Looking back, the era of early aviation offers an intriguing parallel to todayโs cloning debates. Just as pioneers like the Wright brothers faced public skepticism while pushing the boundaries of flight, those involved in cloning now encounter similar mixed reactions. The fear and fascination surrounding novel technology resonate across time, showcasing humanity's complex relationship with innovation. In both cases, the lure of progress often clashes with ethical standards and societal norms, reminding us that as we craft new possibilities, we must also consider the impact of our choices on the broader world.