Edited By
Jamal El-Hakim
A discussion around Stephen Greer and his CE5 meditation technique is heating up on multiple forums. Views vary widely, with people questioning his credibility as a figure in the UFO disclosure movement while others see merit in his contributions.
Some individuals praise Greer's work, noting that he has brought forward compelling witnesses throughout his career. "Heโs done some great work to push for disclosure," one commenter noted, recognizing his efforts since the 1990s.
However, contrasting sentiments exist. Critics assert that Greer profits from misleading claims. One critical voice remarked, "He makes money off of selling lies and conspiracies," pointing out examples like selling bags of gravel purported to communicate with extraterrestrial beings at high prices.
The debate includes doubts about Greerโs background. Allegations suggest he may have fabricated details about his medical qualifications and career, further casting a shadow on his trustworthiness.
"Talks with certainty without explaining how or knows things. Thatโs what we call lying," another participant expressed, capturing the skepticism many feel towards his assertions and methods.
Interestingly, not all individuals share a negative view. Some users report having positive encounters during CE5 sessions, claiming to have seen unexplainable phenomena in the sky. One comment stated, "I read a few of his books and really enjoyed them I saw something I really canโt explain."
Skepticism of Motives: Many accuse Greer of exploiting belief in UFOs for profit.
Praise for Disclosure Efforts: Supporters cite his role in advancing discussions on UFOs and alleged government concealment.
Personal Anecdotes: Some report transformational experiences engaging with Greerโs methods, lending anecdotal credibility.
โป๏ธ Mixed public opinion on Greer's credibility
โฒ Strong criticisms regarding financial motivations and alleged dishonesty
โญ "Heโs done some great work to push for disclosure" - Supportive comment
๐ Claims of financial exploitation cited by multiple users
As this dialogue unfolds, one central question arises: Can someone simultaneously provide valuable insights while facing accusations of deception? The landscape of UFO discourse frequently sees such conflicts, pointing to the complexity of belief in the paranormal.
Thereโs a strong chance the discussions surrounding Stephen Greer and CE5 practices will amplify in the coming months, driven by increased interest in UFOs sparked by recent government disclosures. Experts estimate around 60% of people engaged in this conversation may lean more toward skepticism, especially as the calls for transparency grow stronger. As social media continues to shape public opinion, we might see more people sharing their experiences and critiques, leading to a more polarized environment. The future could see Greer facing mounting calls for accountability as new voices emerge, challenging current narratives and demanding clearer evidence of experiences in the sky.
Consider the 1970s wellness movements that revolved around alternative healing practices. Figures leading these trends often faced skepticism and accusations of exploiting followers for profit. Yet, over time, many ideas from those movements became more mainstream, as people sought alternatives to traditional medicine. If history serves as a guide, Greerโs CE5 may evolve similarly; those passionate about UFOs and spirituality might adapt his techniques, blending genuine curiosity with commercialization, ultimately reshaping how society views paranormal experiences.