
A lively discussion is emerging online about the possibility of human civilizations existing 1 to 2 billion years ago. This idea is challenging long-held beliefs about our history and evolution.
Recent comments have added depth to the ongoing discourse. One participant remarked, "I canโt really take that idea seriously," highlighting the skepticism surrounding claims of ancient advancements.
Another contributor pointed out, "If you assume the Earth has been here for 4.6 billion years and humans for 6 million, it took four billion five hundred ninety-four million years for human life to evolve." This emphasizes the improbability of advanced civilizations existing so long ago.
Skepticism Toward Ancient Civilizations
Users expressed doubts about the legitimacy of any advanced civilizations from billions of years ago, questioning the likelihood of any remaining evidence.
Impacts of Technological Collapse
Discussions also touched on the notion that if modern civilization were to collapse, it might prevent a resurgence of similar technological advancements.
Alien Theories
Some even speculated about possible alien civilizations visiting Earth. Comments suggested there might be unusual isotope traces adding credence to this theory.
"It's possible there was a civilization of aliens who visited here and set up camp," said one commenter, echoing sentiments found in theories like the "Silurian Hypothesis."
Sentiments are mixed among commentators. While some cling to traditional narratives, others are exploring unconventional theories. Comments like, "Legitimate remote viewers," reflect a portion of people open to alternative explanations.
โณ The debate continues with skepticism dominating the narrative.
โฝ Preservation of evidence from ancient civilizations remains unlikely due to geological degradation.
โป "How did Homo sapiens defeat Neanderthals with only the advantage of Bow & Arrow?" - A question sparking further thought on human evolution.
The discussion of possible ancient civilizations stirs curiosity and debate among the public. Will these conversations lead to a redesign of historical timelines, or do long-established narratives still hold? Time will tell.